By W. David Gardner
Read the Original Article at InformationWeek

Nokia cell phone users using the Symbian operating system can now download software for the Skype VoIP calling service.

Nokia, which has some 37% of the global handset market, said the download is free and available from its Ovi online store. Skype users can call each other free of charge and can call non-Skype users for a low rate, generally about 2.5 cents a minute.

The development follows an announcement last month from Verizon Wireless that it, too, would offer Skype VoIP service to users of several Verizon smartphones. Until recently, most wireless carriers fought the use of Skype and other VoIP services, but as revenue for data and other carrier services has risen, the carriers have begun to climb on board the VoIP bandwagon.

The Nokia-Symbian arrangement, moreover, dramatically raises the bar for VoIP calling because nearly 50% of the world's mobile phones use the Symbian OS. Not all Symbian phones will initially be able to use Skype, but Nokia indicated some 200 million handsets will be able to use the service from the get-go.

For Nokia, the availability of Skype on its Ovi applications site is expected to boost traffic to the store. "We're seeing around 1.5 million downloads a day through Ovi store now and believe that the Skype client for Nokia smartphones increases the amount of downloads further," said Jo Harlow, Nokia senior VP for smartphones, in a statement.

Nokia indicated that Skype will also soon be available on Sony-Ericsson handsets using Symbian.

Nokia has been installing Skype apps on its phones gradually, ever since it announced a year ago that the VoIP service would be available for its N97 flagship phone's address book.

The latest Skype for Symbian application is compatible with the following Nokia models: Nokia E71, Nokia N96, Nokia N85, Nokia 5320, Nokia 6210 Navigator, Nokia 6220 classic, Nokia N78, Nokia N79, Nokia E63, Nokia E66, Nokia N82, Nokia E51, Nokia N95, Nokia N95 8Gb, Nokia N81, Nokia N81 8 Gb, Nokia E90, Nokia E72, Nokia 5800 XpressMusic, Nokia N97, Nokia N97 mini, Nokia X6, and Nokia 5530.


By Thomas Claburn
Read the Original Article at InformationWeek

In a move to make its massive store of video content more accessible, Google's YouTube is making automated caption generation available to all YouTube users.

YouTube initially added a caption feature in 2008. Last November, it introduced auto-captioning for a select group of partners.

Now, any video created with a clear audio track -- unless disallowed, an option for some of YouTube's content partners -- can be captioned automatically, thanks to the speech-to-text algorithms that power Google Voice Search.

What's more, those captions can be translated from English into one of 50 supported languages at the viewer's discretion.

At the moment, auto-captioning only works in videos with spoken English, but Google product manager Hiroto Tokusei says in a blog post that YouTube plans to support the captioning of more languages in the months ahead.

In a related effort, Google is also working to turn Android phones into universal translators through a combination of speech-to-text and translation technology.

"For content owners, the power of auto-captioning is significant," said Tokusei. "With just a few quick clicks your videos can be accessed by a whole new global audience. And captions can make is easier for users to discover content on YouTube."

Captions, as text content, are useful to Google as a way to improve search relevancy. And with the volume of information that Google has to manage -- over 20 hours of video are uploaded to YouTube every minute -- every improvement helps.

Although speech-to-text conversion isn't perfect, Tokusei says that Google's technology is getting better. Video owners can also improve caption files by downloading them, making corrections, and then uploading them back to YouTube.

Other Google accessibility projects include a talking RSS reader for Android devices, support for WAI-ARIA, the Accessible Rich Internet Applications Suite, in Google Chrome, and support for the AxsJAX framework.

About 650 million people live with a disability, according to the UN.

By 2015, Professor Adrian Davis of the British MRC Institute of Hearing Research estimates that more than 700 million people will be suffering from hearing loss of more than 25 dB, a consequence both of aging and of exposure to noise, among other causes.

Last October, Google consolidated its accessibility resources at a single Web address.

Google Buys Picnik

By Thomas Claburn
Read the Original Article at InformationWeek

Google on Monday said that it had acquired Picnik, an online photo editing service that works with Internet applications from several Google competitors.

"More than ever before, people are sharing and storing their photos online," said Google product management director Brian Axe in a blog post . "But until recently, you had to edit your photos using client software on your computer."

The price that Google paid for Picnik was not disclosed.

While the Picnik acquisition doesn't represent an immediate threat to Adobe Photoshop, the desktop photo editing standard for professionals, it's yet another indication that online applications represent the future.

Adobe, of course, already operates Photoshop.com , a pared-down version of its desktop photo editing application.

Picnik allows users to crop, resize, rotate, and alter online images in real-time, to apply a variety of filters, effects, and fonts, and to use browser extensions to make it easier to upload and edit images. It overlaps to some extent with Google's Picasa service.

No immediate charges are expected as a result of the deal.

But the extent to which Picnik interoperates with services like Facebook and Yahoo Mail remains open to question under Google's management. Google may well want to maintain Picnik's interoperability with non-Google services, but it remains to be seen whether Facebook and Yahoo find that idea appealing.

According to Axe, Google is working on integrating Picnik and on new features for the service.

It's also unclear how Google will deal with Picnik's premium features, which are available for $25 per year. Google has tended to offer consumer-oriented services for free.

During its earnings call for investors last October, Google CEO Eric Schmidt said that the company was again looking for new acquisitions and that Google in the past had acquired about one company every month.

Picnik is Google's ninth acquisition in the past eight months.

Source: Techweb.com


By Thomas Claburn
Read the Original Article at Information Week

Google, PayPal, Equifax, VeriSign, Verizon, CA, and Booz Allen Hamilton on Wednesday at the RSA Conference announced that they have formed a non-profit organization to oversee the exchange of online identity credentials on public and private sector Web sites.

The organization, The Open Identity Exchange (OIX) , will serve as a trust framework provider. A trust framework is a certification program that allows organizations and individuals to exchange digital credentials and to trust the identity, security, and privacy assertions associated with those credentials.

With help from the OpenID Foundation and the Information Card Foundation, OIX has been authorized to serve as a trust framework for the U.S. government. It will certify identity management providers to make sure they meet federal standards.

Google, Equifax, and PayPal will be the first three identity providers to issue digital identity credentials as a way to enable privacy-protected registration and login at U.S. government Web sites.

Verizon is expected to be the fourth, once it completes the certification process.

"We're pleased to be among the first organizations to be certified by the newly created OIX," said Google senior product manager Eric Sachs in a statement. "We've already seen encouraging implementations of identity technologies in the industry, and our hope is that the work of the OIX will expand on this progress to help facilitate more open government participation, as well as improve security on the Internet by reducing password use across websites."

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) Web site is the first government Web site to accept such credentials. Online visitors will be able conduct customized library searches, access training material and medical research wikis, and register for conferences while maintaining some privacy protection.

"Think about giving yourself single sign-on capability for all government services," said Ron Carpinella, VP of identity management at Equifax, in a phone interview. "In the current environement, you tend to have multiple user IDs and passwords wherever you go. I have 30 pages of user IDs and passwords because of all the different systems I have to engage with. Now, I can have essentially a single sign-on that can be shared across disparate government service providers. I don't have to register every time and place."

What makes these sorts of credentials compelling is that that they allow users to be authenticated without necessarily being identified. The technology could be used, for example, to allow someone to verify residency -- as a requirement for participation in a given online meeting -- without revealing a name or address.

Microsoft, which has done a lot of work on identity and trust, is conspicuous in its absence from the OIX founding group, but Carpinella says that he expects the company will participate.

As more government Web sites support these credentials, online visitors will be able to interact with these sites without having to register for each one or to remember separate site-specific passwords. Carpinella expects that in time OIX certified credentials will provide access to Web sites for the Department of Health and Human Services, Medicare and Medicaid, and the Social Security Administration, to name a few.

Source: Techweb.com

The Revolution Will Be Tweeted

Austin Heap, New America Media

Editor's Note: A 25-year-old cyber activist in San Francisco is helping to provide Internet connections for the opposition in Iran. Since Friday's presidential election, Iranians have been using social networking sites like Twitter to organize demonstrations. As the government of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad attempts to shut down Internet access, a community of cyber warriors is fighting back.

Protesting in Tehran. © Hamed Saber (flickr)

Protesting in Tehran. © Hamed Saber (flickr)SAN FRANCISCO, Jun 16 (New America Media) - It all started at 10:40 p.m. on an otherwise quiet Sunday night. After talking about the Iranian election on and off for several hours, I saw a tweet (a message on Twitter) that pointed out CNN's failure to cover the story. As an obviously rigged election in one of the world's most important countries was being perpetrated, America's oldest 24-hour news network was reporting primarily about how confusing the new fangled digital TVs were.

"Dear CNN: please report about Iran, not Twitter. #cnnfail #iranelection," a user by the name of nympholepsy wrote. The dual hashtags (the pound symbol before a subject, which allows users to search for all tweets on the topic) opened the door for me, a 25-year old who had never even traveled to the Middle East, to become an activist in Iran.

It was probably the tag #cnnfail that appealed to me at first. In 2000, the first presidential election for which I was truly cognizant, I watched as legitimate claims of voter suppression in my native state of Ohio and across the country were ignored by the mainstream media as conspiracy theories.

If the media failed, the populace was complicit. There were no protests that rocked the stability of our government, no mass movements against the subversion of our democracy.

But the other tag, #iranelection, did not have the luxury of our delusion. Even before the ridiculously lopsided results were released, opposition headquarters were sacked, dissidents arrested. The government of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamene Khamenei and President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad wanted to minimize the threat of any opposition leaders organizing a revolution against it. Unfortunately for them, this revolution did not need figureheads to lead it. The Ayatollah had not read the lessons of Moldova, where protestors used sites like Twitter to organize mass protests in April against the Communist government.

Through the power of social networking, individual Iranians were also able to mobilize each other. Twitter hashtags created an instantaneous collectivity that could never be created by mainstream media. When the government realized what was happening, they tried to shut it down. Members of the tech community across the globe did what they could to support it. We started posting functioning relays (or proxies) through which Iranians could subvert government firewalls.

The spontaneity of the tech movement was also one of its weaknesses. With so many updates at #iranelection, it became hard to tell which relays were working and which were not. I started monitoring all of the proxies and created a webpage that listed which proxies were functioning. I asked people I had never met to send messages to me on Twitter to let me know the status of each proxy. And they did.

But that information was public. Anyone on Twitter could find it. Anyone could access the page I had created. When Iran's Guardian Council began monitoring tweets, other members of the community reported it to me. We had to adapt instantly in order to maintain the ability of the Iranian opposition to mobilize. I quickly set up a secure page. Instead of asking people to send me relays publicly, I now asked for them to be sent via Direct Message or e-mail. They came in a flood.

My website has been attacked by Iran. My servers are melting. But individuals in the opposition are still able to use technology to mobilize each other. And the tech community around the world is still able to support them.

Now, less than 24 hours later, I am receiving more than 2,000 simultaneous connections per second from Iran. When I wake up, I will have received more than 300 e-mails from volunteers trying to contribute and lighting the path forward for a movement that is both new and old.

Americans ignored the subversion of their democracy. When a people better than us stood up to secure theirs, I could not let them down. The revolution may not be televised, but it will be tweeted.

China has indefinitely postponed the rollout of its much criticised Internet filtering tool, say the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) and news reports.

The Chinese government has backed away from a "hastily conceived directive" that all new PCs should carry filtering software from 1 July, allegedly to allow overseas PC vendors extra time to prepare for the law, says CPJ. No new deadline has been given.

But Internet activists and bloggers who had opposed the software as intrusive and unsafe also took credit for the rollback.

In May, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology told PC vendors that they had six weeks to include the filtering software Green Dam on all news systems sold in China, which would be paid for by public funds in the first year.

Green Dam, which has already been installed on many school computers in China, was ostensibly conceived to shield children from harmful content such as pornography. But opponents of the measure argued that the software could be used to filter other types of stories and could tighten China's control of the Internet.

The move drew criticism from many IFEX members and other rights groups. A group of Chinese citizens opposed to the law were planning to conduct a one-day boycott of the Internet in protest.

CPJ points out a potential future avenue for campaigning: the U.S. Commerce Department voiced concern that the directive violated international trade rules.

Meanwhile, the Chinese authorities are accusing foreign activists of using the Internet to incite violent protests this week in Xinjiang, report the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ), Reporters Without Borders (RSF) and Voice of America (VOA).

The Uighurs, a mostly Muslim ethnic group with cultural and linguistic ties to Central Asia who have long desired autonomy from Beijing, have used the Internet to rapidly spread images from what they say was a provocative government crackdown on a peaceful demonstration. Chinese authorities say 156 people died on 5 July when Uighurs took to the streets to protest a brawl between Han Chinese and Uighurs in Guangdong last month.

At a news conference on 6 July, Xinjiang's police chief Liu Yaohua singled out the Internet, describing it as the main medium that foreigners use to communicate with Uighurs in China, reports VOA.

The government has removed all Internet references to the protest, and blocked social networking sites and disabled the Twitter messaging system, reports RSF. The authorities claim the interruption was done legally, and is necessary to maintain social stability.

Interestingly, the mainstream Chinese media has "embraced images" of the clashes, which are working to stoke the Han majority's outrage against the Uighur protesters, says CPJ.
Source: Oneworld.net


Symbol Price Change
^DJI 10,325.26 +4.23
^GSPC 1,104.49 +1.56
^IXIC 2,238.26 +4.04

NEW YORK – A new Web sensation called Chatroulette feels like a throwback to the early 1990s, when online chat rooms brimmed with lonely strangers looking for meaningful connections, meaningless sex, or something in between.

But this time, there's a twist: Everyone on the site has a webcam. Chatroulette randomly links users with strangers who could be anywhere in the world. If you don't like the person who pops up on the screen, just click "Next." Repeat.

The result can be unpredictable and raw, like a slap in the face, but also refreshing, a peek into someone else's life. It's far from the sanitized worlds we create for ourselves on sites such as Facebook, where we mainly connect with friends, family and people with common interests.

"Chatroulette is stark because it feels like television. It's like sitting in front of the TV flipping channels, except the people are real," says Hal Niedzviecki, author of "The Peep Diaries: How We're Learning to Love Watching Ourselves and Our Neighbors."

A quick spin the other night yielded a pair of rejections — swift and brutal — from two male users, their faces popping up briefly before they moved on.

Next up was a blur of flesh-colored mass. A blanket? A person? It didn't seem worth it to stick around and find out. To be clear, Chatroulette bans "obscene, offending, pornographic material" and says it will block users who violate these rules, though that does not seem to trouble some people.

Then, a young woman wearing headphones popped up on the screen. Would she hit "Next," like the others before her? She didn't — she typed "Hi." She said she was from China, studying computer engineering. The conversation went something like speed-dating, a little choppy at first but kind of intriguing. She was eating a bag of potato chips.

Chatroulette's setup is simple: Two boxes on the left side of the page are for the webcam videos — one marked "Partner" and the other "You." A larger box to the right is where you type messages to the stranger staring back at you. To start, click "Play," and the site connects you to a random person until you, or the other person, hit "Next."

You can also enable audio. Some folks have used it to play music to their chat partners in hopes of getting them to dance.

People don't need to register to use Chatroulette, though the site asks they be at least 16 years old. It's free to use and has just one understated, text-only advertisement on the bottom of the screen.

The creator of Chatroulette did not respond to messages from The Associated Press. The New York Times identified the creator as a 17-year-old Russian teenager named Andrey Ternovskiy.

The site is no more than a few months old — its domain name was registered in November — yet it drew nearly 1 million unique visitors in January, more than 100,000 of them from the United States, according to comScore. At any given time, tens of thousands of people may be logged on, taking their chances on a finding a meaningful connection, just like a game of roulette.

As Chatroulette takes off, so are copycats and Web sites that collect screen shots showing the best, worst and grossest pairings of people. Some people record video of their sessions and post them on YouTube. A recent search yielded more than 1,200 "Chatroulette" results.

Niedzviecki says Chatroulette is yet another iteration of how we are slowly replacing scripted material with other people's lives as entertainment. YouTube, Twitter and even reality TV let us cruise through a real person's world instead of watching "anointed celebrities entertaining us through their `talents.'"

But when we do, some troubling questions arise. Chatroulette, after all, is not TV. One widely circulated black-and-white image from the site shows what looks like a man who hanged himself. In some cases, people set up their computers to show prerecorded video rather than a live webcam feed, possibly to witness a stranger's reaction to, say, a man slapping a woman so hard she falls out of her chair.

"When you come across someone with a noose around their neck, and it looks like they are dead, you don't have the protection that this is a story, fiction filtered through a board room," Niedzviecki says. "On Chatroulette, that person waving a swastika flag may really be a Nazi trying to recruit you."

The concept of Chatroulette is not entirely new. Sites such as Omegle.com and gettingrandom.com connect strangers for one-on-chats, but without cameras. Justin.tv , meanwhile, lets users broadcast their own live video channels to anyone over the Internet.

And so the troubles that come up aren't new either. Justin.tv came into the spotlight in 2008 when a college student committed suicide with people watching and egging him on. While some viewers called police, it was too late to save the 19-year-old.

Chatroulette, like so much else on the Internet, is not for kids. Sit in front of it long enough and you probably will see a naked person. For people who don't normally seek explicit content on the Internet, this may even be one of the site's appeals, says Robert Thompson, pop culture professor at Syracuse University.

"It's like getting a 'Joker's Wild,' getting a 'Bankrupt' on 'Wheel of Fortune,'" he says.

As for meaningful connections? Chatroulette is kind of like striking up a conversation with a person next to you on the bus or in a bar. You'll probably never see him or her again, but that doesn't mean the talk was worthless.

"There is a great short story to be written about that," Thompson says. "Someone meets the person they were meant to be with ... and they accidentally hit `Next,' never to find them again."