Google Search Partially Blocked In China


Google users in China may have trouble getting search results, Google confirmed on Wednesday.

The company's Mainland China service availability page shows that Google Web Search is partially blocked in China.

The availability issues primarily affect Google Suggest, the query auto-completion service that presents users with a list of likely search queries based on the first few characters typed by the user.




Image Gallery: 5 Early Android 2.2 Candidates

"It appears that search queries produced by Google Suggest are being blocked for mainland users in China," a Google spokesperson said in an e-mailed statement. "Normal searches that do not use query suggestions are unaffected. We have updated our China status page with the latest information."

Due to the complexity of written Chinese, Google users in China click-through search suggestions quite frequently, to avoid having to type out a complete query. Suggested queries can be distinguished from typed queries through an identifier in the URL.

In an effort to make sure its license to operate in China gets renewed, Google on Tuesday said that it will stop redirecting Google.cn visitors from mainland China to Google's Hong Kong site.

Google began the practice in March following its decision in January to stop censoring search results in China, but Chinese authorities have made it clear they don't approve.

It's unclear whether Google's new approach -- a link on Google.cn that leads to its Hong Kong site rather than automatic redirection -- will prove more popular among Chinese officials.

Google's spokesperson said the company wasn't prepared to speculate about whether the issues affecting Search Suggestions in China were related to its efforts to reach an accommodation with the Chinese government to continue operating.

Internet services in China experience occasional interruptions and it's not always clear whether the technical problems have political antecedents.

In a letter to Chinese authorities seeking the renewal of its Internet license, Google promises to "abide by the Chinese law," according to a report in China Daily. The report says that a decision on Google's application is expected soon.

By Thomas Claburn
Read the Original Article at InformationWeek


The solution enables sending RF signals over Ethernet LANs to improve cellular coverage without affecting LAN traffic.

One of the great banes of cell phone use is that users too often can't use the phones in buildings. There is a solution at hand, according to an announcement Tuesday from in-building wireless specialist MobileAccess and Cisco, which together have developed an improved way of sending RF signals over Ethernet LANs.

The companies believe they have a solution to the challenge presented by the flocks of cell phones appearing in growing numbers in higher education, healthcare, hospitality and office facilities.


The application works like this: The MobileAccessVE solution sends RF signals over Cisco CAT-5/6 Ethernet LAN infrastructures. Neither the wired nor the LAN traffic is affected by the application. The application enables enterprises to add cellular coverage and expand Cisco WLAN coverage at the same time at a low cost and in relatively quick time, according to MobileAccess.

"In delivering this integrated solution to enterprise customers," MobileAccess said in the Tuesday announcement, "MobileAccess and Cisco will work closely with a number of wireless service providers to provision the cellular component of the solution."

MobileAccess said it is working with MIT's Information Services & Technology team to install the MobileAcces-Cisco solution at various MIT facilities.

The new application, which has been tested for interoperability with Cisco solutions, is available through Cisco and its channel partners.

"Increased user demands for mobility are driving the need for pervasive 802.11n Wi-Fi and cellular connectivity everywhere," said Ray Smets, vice president of Cisco's Wireless Networking Business Unit, in a statement. "Cisco and MobileAccess are responding to this need with an innovative approach."

By W. David Gardner
Read the Original Article at InformationWeek


Google on Monday said that two more states have given the green light for interested school districts to begin using the company's Web-based applications.

Following Oregon's decision in April to allow its school districts to deploy Google Apps for Education, Colorado and Iowa have agreed to make Google Apps available to over 3,000 schools in the two states.

Google Apps for Education includes Gmail, Docs, Sites, Calendar, Video, and Groups.




Image Gallery: Top 10 Google Videos

While adoption of Google Apps for Education is optional, the service appears to be popular among public school districts in Oregon. Two months ago, Steve Nelson, technology director of Oregon Virtual Schools, said he expected that about 50% of Oregon's almost 200 public school districts would sign up to use Google's online applications in the following 12 months.

Google also said that it is introducing a suite of training solutions and a new online Google Apps Education Training Center to help educators understand Google Apps better.

In addition, Google said that it is extending its promotional security offering to primary and secondary schools. The promotion, which provides free Google Message Security e-mail filtering, was introduced last summer and was scheduled to conclude next month. It will now continue to be available through the end of the year.

On Friday, Google said that it had completed moving its encrypted search service from https://www.google.com to https://encrypted.google.com. The move, announced two weeks ago, was undertaken to allow school administrators to block the use of encrypted search, without interfering with other Google authenticated services.

The company said it is looking into ways to allow encrypted search back on Google.com without compromising school administrators' oversight capabilities.

By Thomas Claburn
Read the Original Article at InformationWeek

As the popularity of cloud computing is taking off, so have questions and complaints from IT professionals who are using -- or considering moving to -- the cloud. Industry leaders answer some of the main concerns that they hear from IT staff about the cloud.

Gripe #1: "Wait, this isn't really infinite, is it?"

One of the big draws of cloud computing is the ability to start small and then go big at a moment's notice. But this elasticity should not be mistaken for infinity.

"It seems infinite, but it absolutely is not infinite," says Imad Mouline, CTO of Gomez, the web performance division of Compuware. "In some circumstances, you may not be able to get the instance that you want, the data center or availability zone that you want, or the kind of instance that you want."

You may be exposed to operational risk if your business depends upon being able to provision any level of cloud resources at a moment's notice. "Are you willing to bet your business on it?" asks Mouline. "Or are you taking a chance that on the day that you need to ramp up that you'll have the capacity and that you'll get to it quickly, in hours instead of days?"

If several heavy users of cloud services simultaneously have the same idea to scale up, you may end up in the tech equivalent of a financial panic where everyone tries to withdraw money from a bank that holds inadequate reserves.

Gripe #2: "It's too slow!"

Your computing resources are only as fast as the slowest link of the information supply chain, and if your slowest link is an underpowered cloud computing provider, you may have grounds for a gripe.

"We've won customers that way," says Jonathan Hoppe, president and CTO of Cloud Leverage, a provider of cloud performance solutions.

"Say you've got a website that's going to pull images from cloud storage," Hoppe says. "You want that connection to be very fast, and you also need both to be very fast when delivering to the end users."

Perform some simple performance tests before you start doing business with a cloud provider, and make sure you understand the quality of service and performance guarantees in the service level agreements. "You can tell a lot by looking at the SLAs," Hoppe says. "If they're pretty aggressive, they have a lot of confidence in their infrastructure."

And just because you're using an Amazon- or Google-branded cloud doesn't mean that your website will have the same performance as Amazon or Google. Web performance stems from several factors, including overall web traffic, the location of the data centers to which you've been assigned, and even the behavior of other applications in that same data center. "You can't sandbox everything, and someone else's application may impact the performance of yours," observes Mouline from Gomez. "Performance is all over the place."

You can find Gomez's top-level performance results for major public cloud providers at CloudSleuth.net.


Gripe #3: "I can do this cheaper in-house."

The benefits of cloud computing don't necessary scale up. "If you have a large enough organization, the subscription model tends to lose some of its clear cost benefit," says Mike Pearl, principal in PricewaterhouseCoopers' Advisory practice and Leader of PwC's digital transformation and cloud computing initiatives. "Turning potentially thousands of employees loose onto the cloud introduces variability into costs [relative to fixed budgets]."

Mark White, CTO of Deloitte Consulting's technology practice, also observes diseconomies of scale at the high end. "For some of the larger enterprise clients of ours, who are able to scale relatively high and have good volumes and get good discounts from vendors, they're finding that it's not particularly advantageous from a cost perspective to go to a public cloud infrastructure, particularly as it relates to storage or other services that are relatively commoditized," White says.

Nor is capacity management necessarily a strong selling point, as large enterprises tend to have a good handle on their demand curve for IT services. "They tend to not be exposed too much to the spikes of usage that a smaller company would have," notes White.

Instead, flexibility is the area where the largest enterprises find the greatest benefit in the cloud. "It's the opposite of a startup situation, which has spiky usage patterns but can provision quickly," observes White. "Big companies have smooth usage patterns but are slow to provision new resources."

Gripe #4: "I don't have enough control."

With internally managed and collocated facilities, IT professionals can precisely match the availability and uptime needs of the enterprise using dedicated equipment, selecting the most appropriate power supplies, cooling equipment, and server hardware.

That's not so easy to manage in the cloud. "When someone puts their data and applications in the cloud, it's almost impossible for them to know what specific hardware they're on, where their data resides, where their power is coming from, or if there's adequate cooling," says Charles O'Donnell, VP of AC power engineering for Emerson Network Power.

If you want to maintain maximum control, you may end up doing it in-house. "We have one very large customer that keeps revenue-generating applications on an enterprise farm, Tier 4 facility, and keeps their e-mail and product development at a Tier 2 facility," says O'Donnell. "If e-mail goes out for a little while, it's not a disaster. It costs them time and money but it's nothing like what happens if their enterprise facility were to go down."

"If I had a mission-critical application, where if it goes out I start losing current or future revenue, that's something I want to have complete control over myself," remarks O'Donnell.

Gripe #5: "We've got clouds popping up all over the enterprise."

Allowing unfettered, enterprise-wide access to cloud resources poses significant business risks, observes Philip Lieberman, founder and CEO of privileged identity management provider Lieberman Software.

"Business users see the cloud as a way of saving money without understanding the security, audit, or regulatory implications," he says. "Cloud is being brought in through the back door, and when auditors discover what's been done, they need to make a judgment as to what the exposure is."

Often, the risks aren't worth the ostensible cost savings from the cloud providers. "It's their business to give you compute power at a low cost," Lieberman adds. "They're not in the security business."

Enterprise IT departments are advised to reclaim the relationship between business units and external providers. "As you begin to look at cloud computing at the enterprise level, you need to first go throughout the business units to clean out the early adopters," says PwC's Pearl. "Bring those that jumped out in front into your overall enterprise strategy."

Gripe #6: "Without standards, I'm locked into my cloud vendor."

Portability has become the biggest gripe in cloud computing at the enterprise level, according to Edward Newman, global practice director of private cloud services at EMC. "It's not as if you can burst a workload out to Amazon today and then burst it out to Rackspace or Terremark tomorrow," he says. "The standards haven't yet been adopted that allow for easy movement of workloads and data to multiple cloud vendors."

Portability in the cloud would have to encompass a complicated set of policies and business requirements with regard to IT policies, regulatory compliance, and information security practices, which makes for a particularly challenging set of standards.

"You need the ability to migrate data from one cloud service provider to another, and there are cloud interoperability scenarios that need to be addressed as well," notes Matt Edwards, director of the cloud services initiative at TM Forum, a communications industry association. "There are multiple things that need to be addressed to avoid vendor lock-in and to remove the barriers for the adoption of cloud services."

Although the issues are widely recognized, consensus on the best solution is harder to reach. "New standards organizations for cloud crop up every day," says Edwards.

For its part, TM Forum has formed the Enterprise Cloud Leadership Council, with members from the banking, pharmaceutical, energy, healthcare, manufacturing, automotive, aerospace, government, and communications sectors. "While there are specific business requirements in each industry, there's no need to reinvent the wheel for every vertical," says Edwards. "The key is to have a coordinated approach, and to make sure that the actual business requirements of enterprise consumers are being addressed."


Gripe #7: "My cloud's in the way of my M&A."

Before entering into an outsourcing arrangement, consider the likelihood that your organization will be involved in an acquisition or divestiture, suggests Daren Orzechowski, New York-based partner in White & Case's intellectual property practice. "One of the most important provisions in outsourcing for cloud is to have certain divestiture and acquisition support provisions," Orzechowski says.

Essentially, it's a matter of ensuring that you can scale up or down no matter the direction your business takes you. If you acquire a company, you'll want to support it with the same or better terms for enterprise cloud resources. Similarly, if you sell off a part of your company, ensure that both buyer and seller won't be held hostage by rate hikes after the deal closes.

"Make sure you'll get the assistance you need from your vendor, and that the terms of how that will work are fixed at the beginning of the relationship, when you have more leverage," says Orzechowski. "Like any commercial relationship, if you've signed the original big contract and you're in, and then you need help down the road, your leverage isn't as good."

Gripe #8: "I'm relying on reputation as a security policy."

High-profile technology providers face enormous scrutiny from customers and investors, with reputational risk involved with even the smallest lapses in availability and security. Accordingly, cloud providers have the incentive and wherewithal to retain teams of dedicated security experts capable of coping with a wide range of fast-moving threats. All things considered, public cloud providers may be better than you at information security.

Smaller, non-IT-focused enterprises find it harder to locate, hire, and retain top information security talent, and it's not uncommon in business to see small, overworked IT departments where the responsibility for security is diffused and even a few steps behind.

But just because the largest cloud vendors employ the smartest guys in the room doesn't automatically mean that they should have oversight of your enterprise data.

Before entrusting enterprise data to a cloud provider, do your homework. "Go to their website and read the discussion boards and blogs. Go to the analysts. Go to the regulations in your industry," advises Mohammad Zaman, head of global solutions at Logicworks, a low-latency hosting provider in New York. "There are many different ways to find the right cloud service provider from a security perspective."

Or, simply follow the herd. "Everybody publishes customer references on their website," Zaman says. "How do you match up against them?"

Unfortunately, it's all too common that these reputation-based approaches to due diligence represent the extent of information that's available from cloud vendors for purchasing decisions.

It's a "buyer beware," remarks Zaman.


Gripe #9: "Good enough for government work? Nope."

You won't find more security-conscious users than in government, and it may take a while before they go into the cloud. "Until someone says that they can meet the NIST criteria for cloud security, I don't see many government customers trusting their applications and data to the cloud infrastructure," says Jim Sweeney, principal solutions consultant for GTSI, a government solutions provider.

Security concerns include the integrity of data, protections in a multi-tenant environment, management of loading and offloading of data, and the trustworthiness of vendor employees, along with questions about the financial stability of vendors.

But it's not just information security that's holding up adoption. "People are using security as an excuse to not move to the cloud in order to protect their jobs," Sweeney says. The typical game plan: "I'm going to have my own internal cloud for my customers."

That's not much of an improvement over existing infrastructure, Sweeney counters. "Why move to a cloud at all?" he asks.

An alternative model places the most technologically savvy agencies as operators of cloud-based services and infrastructures on behalf of other agencies. Leading the way in this regard is the Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA), an arm of the Department of Defense that provides computing infrastructure and services to the military.

At the InformationWeek Government IT Leadership Forum in June, DISA's CIO Henry Sienkiewicz announced plans to deliver storage and office productivity applications through DISA's private cloud, which could potentially be extended elsewhere within government.

Gripe #10: "Cloud computing is going to put me out of a job."

For the people responsible for maintaining enterprise hardware, the cloud can appear to have the guise of a deadly fog. Should IT professionals fear the cloud?

"If your dream is to build servers and to be on call 24x7 when routers or servers go down, maybe you should be afraid," Stephen J. Roux, founder and president of Farmington, Conn.-based solution architect Innovative Computer Systems. "But if your goal is to see your company grow and become more agile, they still need someone to show them how to make the whole thing work.

"Rather than turning a wrench, sit down and have strategic conversations with the business," adds Roux. "Instead of provisioning servers and data centers, help the business get the most out of their applications."




Programmers don't much care for suits or incompetence, a study finds.

Software engineers hate dress codes and large corporations and believe their managers to be incompetent.

These are the general findings of Dariusz Jemielniak, associate professor of management of the Kozminski Business School in Warsaw, Poland, who concludes that "paradoxically, the rebellious role programmers play in many organizations may result from the strong expectations organizations explicitly present them with."

Between 2001 and 2006, Jemielniak interviewed and observed software developers at three Polish and two U.S. IT companies. He asked them about how they software perceived dress codes, their careers, organizations, and managers.

His 2007 paper detailing his observations, noted recently in the Annals of Improbable Research, reveals that software engineers don't like to wear suits.


Programmers, he says, believe their profession does not have a dress code. Out of 55 programmers interviewed at five different organizations, none wore a suit or tie, unlike salespeople and managers.

While those interviewed by Jemielniak rejected dress codes in general, they acknowledged the utility of formal dress when dealing with clients outside the company.

The prevailing attitude of software engineers toward dress codes is also reflected in their attitude toward managers. They are skeptical about the sincerity managerial rhetoric and organizational announcements.

"Software engineers criticized the highly political nature of organizational life and its irrationality, resulting from undue bureaucracy," Jemielniak says in his paper. "They also resented the fact that in many companies they have to engage in the game on managerial terms, so as not to be marginalized."

Mangers for software engineers are, more or less, the pointy haired boss depicted in the Dilbert comic strip.

"Software engineers question not only managerial competence in IT projects," Jemielniak says. "They also challenge managerial knowledge per se. People who pursue a career in management do so because they cannot do anything else."

Managerial ignorance of technical matters, software engineers believe, leads to unrealistic demands.

In attempting to explain this antipathy toward authority, Jemielniak offers several possibilities. It's partly the nature of the manager-worker relationship, he suggests. It may also reflect the tension between a profession that calls for creativity, intuition, and improvisation, which are at odds with conformist corporate norms. Software engineers also appear to value competence over professional status or age.

Another explanation may reside in managers' use of surveillance technology to monitor the output of software engineers. Jemielniak notes that in four of the five companies surveyed, programmers were subject to monitoring.

Faced with conflicting managerial mandates to think outside the box and write creative code and to produce code as if it were a commodity, Jemielniak concludes it's understandable that software engineers see managers as "lazy, stupid careerists."

By Thomas Claburn
Read the Original Article at InformationWeek


Hoping to push its way past iPhone and Droid X headlines, Research In Motion revealed its first quarter performance. How did the company fare? Pretty well, all things considered. Let's look at the numbers.

RIM says that its revenue climbed 24% over the year-ago quarter from $3.42 billion to $4.24 billion. On that revenue, RIM netted $768.9 million, up from $643 million in the year-ago quarter. The company sold 11.2 million BlackBerries and has now shipped over 100 million of the popular mobile email machines. What's interesting to note is that its subscriber base increased by 60% over the prior year to 46 million, with 4.9 million net new subscriber accounts added in the first quarter. After everything is said and done, RIM has about $3.27 billion of cash (or cash equivalents) in the bank.


"RIM achieved significant earnings growth and shipped a record 11.2 million devices during the first quarter, including its 100 millionth BlackBerry smartphone," said RIM co-CEO Jim Balsillie in a prepared statement. "We continue to be focused on growing our business globally and we believe that the range of exciting new BlackBerry products being released in the coming months will create significant opportunities to accelerate RIM's growth in the second half of the fiscal year."

RIM has a more important quarter ahead of it. The company is preparing to release BlackBerry 6, the latest version of its operating system. This new version, which has been previewed, but not shown in detail, needs to make serous usability improvements if RIM want's to continue to sell millions of BlackBerries. Competitors Apple and Google have both recently refreshed their mobile operating systems, each adding features

Given the crush of people lining up at Apple Stores today for the iPhoen 4, Apple will likely sell 1 million new iPhones today or within the next few days. Strong demand will likely follow for the following weeks as the early supply chain issues are sorted out.

Google says 160,000 Android phones are being activated every day. Google and partners Motorola and Verizon Wireless just announced the latest flagship Android device, the Droid X. It is likely to be a smash hit for Verizon this summer.

RIM needs to deliver on both new handset(s) and new software to keep Apple and RIM at bay. The software is expected to debut some time this summer.

By Eric Zeman
Read the Original Article at InformationWeek

Software developers believe Google's Android platform has a better long-term outlook, better technological capabilities, and greater openness than Apple's iOS platform.

These are some of the findings of a survey of 2,733 developers conduct between June 15 and 17 by Appcelerator, maker of the Appcelerator Titanium Developer Platform.


The developers in question happen to be users of Appcelerator Titanium, the sort of cross-platform development tool that Apple doesn't like, so it may seem to make sense that those surveyed would prefer the openness of the Android platform to Apple's more controlled approach.

But it's not that simple. "As our survey points out, our developers actually are more interested in Apple's products than Google's," said Scott Schwarzhoff, VP of marketing at Appcelerator. "We also know that there are currently more Titanium apps written for the iPhone and iPad than for Android."

Apple's iOS 4 SDK Agreement impose fairly strict limitations on the kind of code developers may write. "Applications must be originally written in Objective-C, C, C++, or JavaScript as executed by the iPhone OS WebKit engine, and only code written in C, C++, and Objective-C may compile and directly link against the Documented APIs," the SDK Agreement states.

If interpreted strictly, these terms would disallow a host of third-party development tools such as Adobe Flash, Unity3D, Ansca Mobile's Corona, and Appcelerator Titantium. The makers of these tools and many developers have objected strongly to this language and prompted regulators at the Federal Trade Commission to begin reviewing Apple's rules for possible antitrust implications.

Apple's aim with these rules, as articulated by CEO Steve Jobs, is to prevent a third-party development platform, specifically (though not exclusively) Adobe Flash, from becoming the preferred mode of authoring for iOS devices. Such tools, Jobs contends, create substandard apps and limit the progress of the iOS platform. Apple also wants to exercise control over advertising and analytics data.
By Thomas Claburn
Read the Original Article at InformationWeek

Cloud Services To Top $68 Billion In 2010


Large enterprises flocking to cloud services will drive upwards of 15% growth in cloud services this year says Gartner with projected growth approaching $150 billion in 2014.

Global cloud services this year will reach $68.3 billion, as large corporations increasingly cut multi-thousand-seat deals with vendors, a market research firm says.

The expected revenue this year amounts to a 16.6% increase from 2009, when sales hit $58.6 billion, Gartner reported Tuesday. The strong growth is expected to continue for several years, reaching $148.8 bill in 2014.


"We are seeing an acceleration of adoption of cloud computing and cloud services among enterprises and an explosion of supply-side activity as technology providers maneuver to exploit the growing commercial opportunity," Gartner researcher Ben Pring said in a statement. "The scale of application deployments is growing; multi-thousand-seat deals are increasingly common."

Enterprises appear to be embracing the core ideas of cloud computing, such as pay for use, multi-tenancy and external services, Gartner said. In part, the popularity of the computing model is due to the financial downturn over the last 18 months, which has made the ability of cloud computer to deliver functionality less expensively than in-house software attractive.

"Cloud computing has become more material, because the challenges inherent in managing technology based on the principles of previous eras -- complex, custom, expensive solutions managed by large in-house IT teams -- have become greater, and the benefits of cloud computing in addressing these challenges have matured to become more appropriate and attractive to all types of enterprises," Pring said.

The largest markets from a geographic perspective are in North America and Europe. The U.S. share of the worldwide cloud services market was 60% in 2009, Gartner said. This year, the U.S. share will fall to 58%, declining to 50% by 2014, as companies and governments in other countries and regions adopt cloud services.

In industry terms, financial services and manufacturing industries are the largest early adopters, with communications and high-tech industries also leveraging the cloud in significant volume.

Despite the positive projections, large corporations still have "strong concerns" about cloud computing, with security topping the list, Gartner said. Other concerns include availability of service, vendor viability and maturity.

By Antone Gonsalves
Read the Original Article at InformationWeek

Google Introduces Command-Line Tool


Having previously referred to its search technology as a "command-line interface to the world," Google has decided to implement an actual command-line tool for several of its services.

On Friday, Google announced the availability of GoogleCL, open-source software for Linux, Mac, and Windows that allows users to perform sophisticated tasks on a handful of Google sites.




Image Gallery: Top 10 Google Videos
(click for larger image and for full photo gallery)

"GoogleCL is a command-line utility that provides access to various Google services," explain Google engineer Jason Holt and former Google intern Tom Miller in a blog post. "It streamlines tasks such as posting to a Blogger blog, adding events to Calendar, or editing documents on Google Docs."

While Google provides instructions for installing GoogleCL on Linux, it only points to online posts by third-parties that describe how to install the software on Mac and Windows. Mac installation is made easier if the user has already installed software like MacPorts or homebrew.

The open source project Wiki indicates that easier Mac and Windows installation may available in the future.

GoogleCL is a Python application that uses Python gdata libraries to make Google Data API calls from the command line.

It currently provides access to the following services, arranged in order of implementation completeness: Picasa, Docs, YouTube, Blogger, Calendar, and Contacts.

Users can employ GoogleCL to do things like list, delete, and create Blogger posts, Picasa albums and images, or open Google Docs in an editor like vim.

There are other open source projects -- goofs and Goose, for example -- that aim to provide similar functionality for Google Calendar and Google Search. At some point, these projects may be merged with GoogleCL.

By Thomas Claburn
Read the Original Article at InformationWeek

Superhighway To Hell


The conventional wisdom is positive--giddy, really--about what the Internet holds for the planet's expanding connected population.

Dear InformationWeek Reader:

I regret to inform you that everything you think you know about the future of the Internet is wrong. Sorry.

Further, there are only two opinions about the future: mine, which is right, and "everybody else's," which is not right.

The conventional wisdom is positive--giddy, really--about what the Internet holds for the planet's expanding connected population. It envisions an Internet where users worldwide enjoy speedy, inexpensive Internet connections. As this new society develops, national identities are subsumed by knowledge into a global community whose users are enabled, even emancipated, by the Internet and the information it carries.

But suppose for a moment this is not the future. What if the "wisdom of crowds" turns out to be the ignorance of the masses? In fact, what if the Internet is a "really bad thing" for the world and its population?

Decline And Fall (Mainly Fall)

The Internet of the late 20th century was chaotic--an unregulated, borderless virtual entity that grew organically based on U.S. technological innovation and its ability to allow users to anonymously access vast amounts of information for free.

The media have been silent on the possibility that a network so vast could be anything other than a great enabling force for mankind. But the journey to the Internet's darker side has already begun with a game-changing addition to the Web's most popular application: search.

Search engines like Google and Bing, social networks like Facebook, computer software developers like Microsoft, and e-commerce sites like Amazon and eBay now monitor and store information about users' search activity and use this data to create profiles about who the searchers are (identity), where they are (location), what they want (preferences), how much money they have (financial status), and what they are likely to do or buy next (predictive analysis).

These profiles are already valuable to companies looking to target consumers in the virtual world with advertising for their real-world goods. But as the Internet replaces traditional supply chains, these profiles are set to become an asset of almost inestimable worth--the equivalent of the commodities that powered the Industrial Revolution.

At this point, a phenomenon called "search inversion" takes place. Today's Internet search function morphs from being a useful tool for users to search for products to an essential tool for companies to search for customers.

User profiles become assets owned by the companies that developed them or, eventually, commodities to be bought and sold on "profile markets" or "identity exchanges"--the digital DNA equivalents of the financial and commodities exchanges on which stocks, oil, and gold are traded.

Companies like Google and Facebook are pioneers in the areas of profiling and search inversion, but the Internet's nature (distributed, standards-based, open to all) makes it easy for others to follow their lead. Any Web company that owns servers storing user information can participate in profiling, as can any network service provider providing the pipes.

Profiling will take off fast for another reason: It's legal. It doesn't have to be an invasive activity. It's not necessary, for example, to read e-mails or listen in on Skype calls in order to create prescient profiles. "Patterning"--or knowing which sites users visit, with whom they communicate, and how often--provides companies with more than enough data to create a valuable user profile.

By the middle of this decade, profiling will be commonplace. By the end of 2020 it will be the basis of a new industry, the Outernet, which in economic terms will have outgrown the commercial value of the Internet itself.

The most immediate casualty of profiling is the hallmark of the 20th century Internet: anonymity (aka user privacy). The Internet of this century will be defined by identity.

Internet users are already hastening the end of anonymity by providing free Web services--Facebook, Bebo, Pandora, etc.--with detailed personal information, paying little or no attention to these services' terms of use. These legally binding contracts provide Web operators with paramount rights to users' private information, sometimes including ownership of intellectual property posted to social networks, even after users are no longer site members.

What can users do to protect their privacy? The most obvious option is to not use the Internet--at all. However, this becomes impractical once all digital information is consolidated over the Internet. Not just e-mail, either. Your telephone ceases to function. Your TV won't work, either.

According to the most recent projections, by 2029 only one-third of the world's population will still be waiting for their chance to connect to the Internet. But the other 64% will not only be connected to the Internet, they will be manacled to it.

This invasion of privacy has manifest implications for civil liberties, making the brouhaha over ID cards in the United Kingdom or over Facebook's privacy policy seem like tea-cup squalls. But there's little to suggest that governments around the world are thinking about the implications, or planning to intervene with restrictions, particularly considering the polarity in the positions between those who favor regulation and those Internet Libertarians (aka Libernetters) who regard it with the same level of opprobrium as opponents of changes to the Second Amendment.

But Wait--There's More!

This is just the beginning. Let us sally forth, my friends, in our Chinese-made publishing time machine, to the year 2029. It is now exactly 40 years after the invention of the World Wide Web. The Internet has completed its metamorphosis to Outernet, a transformation marked by two tipping points that occur within a few years of each other:

First, the Internet's primary role changes to that of surveillance network. The devices connected to the Internet whose function is to observe users via sensors, probes, spyware, and cameras now outnumber the devices that users employ to look at Internet content. The Internet is watching you.

Second, the Internet profiling industry has matured. For the first time, the monetary value of the profiles about users exceeds the value of the digital information (music, television, gaming, business data) stored on the Internet itself.

At this point, the Internet has become a sophisticated targeting system for companies to sell "stuff" to consumers, for governments to keep track of citizens, and for law enforcement to track illicit activity. In commercial terms, it will be an Internet where the user becomes the used.

The Internet of 2029 will provide the foundation of a new information-based society--one over which all of the world's information, entertainment, and communications travel, but it also will have attained an unprecedented level of visibility into the lives of this global society's population, including the ability to anticipate individuals' needs, desires, and actions before they are even aware of them.

Is this really the future of the Internet? I think it's close. You probably disagree.

All we know now is that the Internet is a force that no company, government, or individual can control. Like the development of the original Internet itself, the Outernet will arise organically, with an almost palpable disregard for the posturing of those who claim to know the future of communications technology. And that includes the both of us.

Read the Original Article at InformationWeek

Bringing Cloud ROI Down To Earth


The calculation on whether to outsource a given IT function must be based on data loss risk, lock-in and availability, total cost, reasonable investment life spans--and consensus on when good enough is all you need.

Any CEO can look good during an 18-month stint with a successful company in a hot sector. The real test comes over the long haul and during market fluctuations. That same extended perspective can be a sticking point for most return on investment and total cost of ownership calculations around newer technologies, including public cloud services. For example, those skeptical of the public cloud aren't convinced that swapping capital investments for ongoing operating costs will benefit IT long term. How much of an operating cost? How long of an operating period? Is it the same time span that you'd use to evaluate a capital investment, or is this a shell game, where cloud is less expensive in the short run but more costly over time?

It's not just an academic exercise. As any expert on corporate strategy will tell you, fiscal responsibility is about much more than short-term gains.

InformationWeek Analytics' April survey on cloud ROI takes a look at how nearly 400 business technology professionals view the financial impact of public cloud services. The good news is that IT isn't running blindly to this new model.

Cloud computing works for commodity applications, but any integration or complex configuration makes the cost skyrocket, says Jack Garhart, an IT manager with a large international financial institution. "Most of the companies I've worked with like their investments to last five-plus years. It seems that the breakeven point for investments for internal versus SaaS is three to four years. We end up paying less in the beginning, but then pay a lot more in the out years," Garhart says.

Respondents are clearly doing some ROI calculations. But the evaluation periods they're using don't always reflect what we'd call a business system lifetime, even if the factors they're considering are reasonable. So why aren't companies doing the the exhaustive discounted cash-flow analysis needed to study all the variables involved when switching from on-premises systems to cloud?

Mainly, because they're evaluating a moving target. While the National Institute of Standards and Technology did everyone a favor by creating umbrella definitions of cloud computing, when we start diving into details, there's little universal agreement on many areas. What exactly is a private cloud? Can software as a service ever run on one, or does that defeat the purpose?

You get the picture.

We're normally big fans of details. It's granular attention that keeps enterprise systems running. But in this case, we can't fault CIOs for not insisting on the same level of analysis they'd use for an established technology. This is not, however, a green light to give up on fiscal discipline. Instead, one trend emerges after studying our research and speaking with a variety of companies: There's a new breed of smart and disciplined adopter who loosely studies ROI and then revisits the calculation over time to ensure that expected returns are panning out.

"Customers are mostly in test and piloting mode: 'We understand the fundamentals; let's do a pilot to see if it's true and how much it's worth,'" says Marten Mickos, CEO of private cloud systems vendor Eucalyptus. The true discounted cash flow and net present value calculations will happen no sooner than a year from now, Mickos says.

Near term, figure out what factors are important for your company, calculate the specific returns for the implementation you're using, and keep monitoring to make sure reality is in line with expectations.

Risk And Reward

Our InformationWeek Analytics report on cloud risks looks at the biggest barriers to cloud computing adoption; fear of unauthorized access to customer or proprietary information, lack of maturity, and security defects top the list. But if risk can be managed, respondents see good reasons to use these services.

As you'd expect, speed of deployment is near the top of the list of perceived benefits. Lower long-term expenses also sound good, but if you're one of those folks who's building a case for cloud around short-term capital savings, do your homework. Two years of ongoing cloud expenses may be less costly than a one-time build of hardware, but is the comparison going to be favorable for the entire life of the system, perhaps upward of five years?

It may well be, but run the numbers, taking the system lifetime into account. Our full cloud ROI report, free for a limited time at informationweek.com/ analytics/cloudroi, includes a sample ROI worksheet to help with that.

Twenty-eight percent of respondents say there's inherent good in replacing capital expenses with operational expenses. That reminds us of the old PC leasing argument: "If we make PCs an operational expense, then we can't get denied capital--we're in a contract, and we can't get out of it."

That's true enough, but today many companies no longer lease, and not just because they're looking to avoid paying interest. They've also brought their CFOs into the conversation and know that a periodic capital expense can be less costly than an ongoing operational expense. Our point is, capital expenses aren't inherently evil, as long as credit or capital is available, and operational expenses aren't inherently good. It's all about the present value--that is, the normalized value of the future cash outflows in today's dollars, taking into account the potential cost of borrowing.

A small but crafty group of respondents, 14%, would like to move computing expenses off IT's budget and onto line-of-business balance sheets. There's a lot to be said for this idea. The fact is, expressing any purely line-of-business expense in the IT budget misrepresents how much IT costs a company. Our take is that activities that are engaged in for the benefit of only one division should reside in that group's budget, because unless there's another way of encumbering that business unit--like a chargeback--representing these activities on IT's balance sheet hides the true cost of that division.

You don't need cloud computing to make this happen. But the cloud could provide a clean break. One caveat: Off-loading the expense and function to the cloud doesn't mean that IT will be held harmless if the business gets hosed--for example, by being locked in to escalating prices. In our experience, outsourced IT services that go sour always get blamed on internal IT, no matter who picked the provider.

One final note from our survey: We found it troubling that, among companies not using cloud computing, the CIO is the leading skeptic rather than the chief enabler and information gatherer. In fact, the CIO is almost twice as likely to be the naysayer than the next most significant "no" vote.

"CIO" may soon stand for "Cloud Implementation Opposition."

It's very likely that CIOs who are flat-out saying "no" are being bypassed by business units that do their own technology implementations. If it's not happening yet, it soon will be. That also might explain the gap we discovered when we asked business units versus central IT, "Is IT involved in cloud at your organization?" We found that 94% of IT pros said yes versus 79% of those in business units.

Don't say you weren't warned.


By Jonathan Feldman
Read the Original Article at InformationWeek

Apple Updates MobileMe

The "Find My iPhone" app, which allows users to locate a lost iPhone, iPad, or iPod Touch, is one of several improvements to the Apple cloud-based service.

Apple has given MobileMe a new look and has added several improvements, such as the ability to use an iPhone to find a lost iPad and vice a versa.

What hasn't changed is the price for Apple's cloud-based service, which still costs $99. While Google and Microsoft offer many comparable services for free, Apple targets fans willing to pay for a premium service that offers more for people with multiple Apple devices.


The improvements, introduced Thursday, represent tweaks rather than an overhaul. For example, Apple has given the Me.com Web site a new user interface and navigation features, including a new login page. The "Find My iPhone" app can now be used to find a lost iPhone, iPad or iPod Touch. People who own a couple of the devices can use one to find the other, or use a friend's Apple device. The service can also be used to remotely wipe out all the data on a lost device. The deletion can be undone if the owner later recovers the device.

People can login to Me.com via Web browser to locate any one of the three devices. The expanded location feature requires iOS 3.1.3 or later. IOS is the new name for the iPhone OS.

E-mail via MobileMe has also been upgraded with widescreen and compact views for the iPad and iPhone, respectively. Apple has added single-click archiving and new rules to keep email organized across devices.

Other enhancements include better overall performance, support for SSL for better security when using a browser, improved junk mail filtering and support for sending from external e-mail addresses.

Apple introduced the e-mail refresh to MobileMe subscribers last month on an invitation-only basis. The upgrade works best with Safari 4, Firefox 3.6 and Internet Explorer 8 or higher versions.

One of MobileMe's key features as an online file-sharing service is to synchronize data across Apple hardware and a PC.

By Antone Gonsalves
Read the Original Article at InformationWeek

Insight Bank Cuts Costs in the Cloud

Insight Bank leverages Egnyte's cloud-based file server for secure document sharing at one-sixth the cost of a packaged solution.

When a seasoned and expansion-oriented management team took the helm at Insight Bank in late 2008, one of the first systems identified for retooling was document sharing. "Our existing system was increasingly inadequate to support the swift growth that was taking root," explains Harvey Glick, the Columbus, Ohio-based bank's CEO and president. "We needed a secure and compliant method for our widely dispersed board members to share documents as well as for our loan committee, audit committee and others to efficiently collaborate."

After bringing a new IT director on board in early 2009, Insight evaluated the options. "First we considered using an off-the-shelf product," Glick recalls. "But, with a lean IT staff of one, customizing a packaged solution would have taken too much time away from other urgent projects. So we began investigating the cloud."

By May 2009, Insight ($106 million in total assets) had narrowed potential software-as-a-service vendors with the necessary SAS 70 security certification to two. "One of the vendors claimed it had SAS 70 certification," relates Troy Henley, Insight's IT director. "When we investigated, we discovered the certification was for a facility they weren't even using any longer. It was a good lesson -- always look under the hood when scouting a vendor's security claims."

The other SaaS solution proved cost-prohibitive, placing Insight on the verge of abandoning SaaS as an option. But then the bank discovered Mountain View, Calif.-based Egnyte. "Egnyte was cost-effective due to its scalability," Henley reports. "Plus, it had a higher level of security certification than the alternatives, offered more-granular access controls and was more intuitive for non-technical individuals to use."

Prior to inking a deal, Insight set up a brief test with members of its audit committee to verify the usability of Egnyte's cloud-based file server and access controls. "At that time, we were making so many other changes to banking applications that we didn't want to overwhelm our staff," Henley explains.

An Insight-branded Egnyte web portal was launched in July 2009, but the bank requested some customizations, Henley reports. "For example, we wanted to hide the 'Remember Me' login option to prevent user name and password cookies from being placed on unsecured PCs," he says. "Egnyte quickly released an update that permitted disabling that functionality."

Version control was another requested enhancement. "Egnyte released document 'check out/check in' capability within a few months of our adoption," acknowledges Henley. "This prevents multiple versions from being created and automatically attaches identification information to all modifications. Having this enhanced version-control functionality has reduced confusion as well as improved regulatory compliance."

Since the initial rollout, Insight has added a second portal and implemented desktop backup to the cloud. "We set up a separate site for archived and indexed mortgage documents, permitting our mortgage officers to quickly access the original paperwork," Henley states.

"And, due in part to cloud-based backup using Egnyte, we were able to cost-effectively establish a couple of mortgage satellite locations," Henley continues. "With Egnyte automatically and securely uploading everything in the 'My Documents' folder on those remote machines, it's eliminated the need for a local office server because our mortgage processing system and e-mail systems are also in the secure cloud."

Open to SaaS

Overall, Egnyte has freed up IT resources for Insight's myriad other technology projects and paved the way for adopting other cloud solutions, Henley reports. "We're now using a SaaS-delivered exception reporting solution," he notes. "And we may move [Microsoft] Exchange into the cloud. Our positive experience with Egnyte has definitely made management and board members more open to SaaS."

Most important, the savings and compliance benefits have been significant. "With Egnyte, we have a more secure system for one-sixth the cost of adopting an off-the-shelf solution," Henley asserts. He adds that the bank is saving several thousand dollars a year versus the upkeep and customization of its previous system.

Even Insight's regulator was impressed. "Our FDIC examiner was so impressed with the way that Egnyte's system simplified auditing that he said, 'I finally have a bank board solution to recommend to other institutions,' " recounts Henley. "Egnyte has more than accomplished what we were looking for." n --Anne Rawland Gabriel

SNAPSHOT

INSTITUTION: Insight Bank (Columbus, Ohio).

ASSETS: $106 million.

BUSINESS CHALLENGE: Cost-effectively implement secure document sharing.

SOLUTION: Egnyte's (Mountain View, Calif.) SaaS-based file sharing, storage and backup solution.


Read the Original Article at Bank Systems & Technology

Twitter Warns Of Increased Outages

The next few weeks will be "rocky," the microblogging site said, due to technical problems and increased traffic during the World Cup.

Twitter says record traffic has contributed to more than five hours of downtime this month on the micro-blogging site and is warning users that the next few weeks will be "rocky" as engineers try to solve a number of technical problems.

Twitter acknowledged in a blog post that in terms of site stability and service outages, June is on track to be one of the site's worst months since August 2009. In trying to fix the technical issues, the site has uncovered "unexpected deeper issues" that have caused recent outages and will take time to correct.


In trying to correct the problems, Twitter expects a "rocky few weeks."

"Record traffic and unprecedented spikes in activity are never simple to manage," the site said Tuesday.

A major contributor to the traffic spike is the month-long World Cup soccer competition, which started June 11. While Twitter believed it was ready for the expected increase in traffic, "what we didn't anticipate was some of the complexities that have been inherent in fixing and optimizing our systems before and during the event."

Even before the World Cup, traffic on Twitter was booming. In May, users posted nearly 2 billion tweets, or 64 million a day, according to Web site metrics firm Pingdom. Tweets are short messages that Twitter users broadcast to friends, family, and other followers.

So far this month, Twitter has suffered almost five and half hours of downtime and large bursts of errors, which have lowered its average June uptime to 98.55%, according to Pingdom. By comparison, the site's uptime in May was 99.77%, when it suffered only an hour and 40 minutes of downtime.

Over the next couple of weeks, Twitter plans to perform relatively short planned maintenance that will likely force the company to take down its service. "We will not perform this work during World Cup games, and we will provide advance notification," the site said.

Twitter has a status blog where it posts real-time updates on site outages.

By Antone Gonsalves
Read the Original Article at InformationWeek

Related Posts with Thumbnails